Grant Fund

Know which EU grants your startup qualifies for before reading any of them.

A decision system for founders of pre-seed and seed startups in Europe. Your company's machine-readable profile, screened against 2,813 active EU + national + regional programs by 7 formal eligibility criteria. The rest you don't see.

Start your grant trackGet your free grant fit check4–7 min · No credit card · Result on screen, not in email
€149
per month
cancel in 2 clicks
2,813
programs scanned
re-checked weekly
7
formal criteria
from official call text
readiness_report.lumen-sense.pdf
Fit · 5
EIC Accelerator
Cut-off Oct 14 · up to €2.5M + €15M equity
France 2030 — DeepTech
Rolling · up to €5M · ready to submit
EIC Pathfinder Open
Cut-off Mar 5, 2027 · up to €3M
+ 2 more eligible
Not yet · 7
Eurostars-3 Cut-off 22
Needs 2 international partners w/ MoU
Innovate UK Smart
Pending UK association status
Horizon Cluster 4
Requires consortium of 5 across 4 countries
common gap: existing revenue > €500K
Filtered · 207
89wrong country
47wrong sector
35wrong stage (Series A+)
26wrong entity type
10closed cohorts
you won't see these in the dashboard

What we are not.

01

We're not a list of grants.

EU portals already list every grant. Access isn't the problem — knowing which ones are wasting your time is.

02

We don't write applications for you.

Writing the proposal is your call. We tell you which programs are worth writing for in the first place — and which ones won't pass admissibility no matter how well you write them.

03

We're not consultants you book a call with.

€149/month, billed monthly. Cancel in two clicks. No retainer. No project fee. No “let's hop on a call to scope the engagement”.

04

We don't promise you'll win a grant.

Nobody can promise that, and anyone who does is selling hope. We promise you'll know if applying makes sense at all — in minutes, not weeks.

What one wrong-route grant application actually costs you.

Picture your last 8 weeks. You spotted a Horizon Europe call that looked like a fit. You spent 6 evenings reading the work programme. The CTO drafted a technical narrative. Your CFO ran budget scenarios. Your BizDev chased two academic partners for letters. You lost a Tuesday to consortium structure debates.

Then, two weeks before submission, you found out you'd been looking at the wrong call. You weren't the country lead the call required. The whole stretch wasn't admissible.

Phase 01

Figuring out if it fits at all.

30–70 hours · CEO + technical-lead time
What Grant Fund replaces in 4 minutes

Reading work programmes. Comparing your stage to what the call expects. Trying to translate dense EU language into "yes, we qualify" or "actually, we don’t".

Phase 02

Building the application story.

(the most expensive part)
60–140 hours · CEO + CTO + Ops + BizDev

Cutting your full company story down to the specific piece of work this grant funds. Translating R&D into work packages and milestones. Hunting for partner letters. Re-writing the impact section three times.

Phase 03

Filling the forms and submitting.

35–95 hours · admin

The part everyone thinks is the hard part. It isn’t.

Total
120–260 team hours€12,000 – €26,000of founder + team time at typical early-stage rates

The damage isn't just the hours. It's six to twelve weeks where your team's attention was on a grant instead of the product. And the worst part — most of those hours were avoidable. Whether your company qualifies for that call could have been answered in four minutes, before any of the work started.

And if you do nothing instead

If you skip this entirely and continue without a check — best case, you spend 24–51 hours every month on manual search that may or may not end somewhere. Worst case, you spend the next 6–12 weeks on a wrong-route attempt before noticing. Doing nothing isn't safer. It's the same risk, distributed differently.

How we decide if a grant fits you.

Most grant search tools rank programs by how "relevant" they look to your project — keyword overlap, topic similarity, AI-generated "fit scores" that don't mean anything concrete. A relevance score of 87% can hide the fact that the program requires a consortium of 5 partners across 4 countries — and you're a single applicant in France. You'll find that out three hours into reading the call. That's where 24–51 wasted hours per month go.

Eligibility doesn't work like that. Every EU grant and most national programs have formal admissibility conditions published in the call text. If you fail any one of them, your application is rejected before evaluation — no matter how strong the proposal. So we don't rank programs. We screen them, against the rules the program actually uses.

One founder last month

A founder named Marc — running a six-person hardware startup in Lyon, working on industrial sensors — spent eleven evenings reading a call he eventually didn't pass condition 7 on. (His company would have needed a consortium with two German partners. He had none.) Eleven evenings — and the answer was machine-checkable in under a minute, against the call's own published rules. That's the gap we close.

Layer 1

What's missing for a clean submission.

Eligibility tells you if you can apply. It doesn't tell you if you should apply now. Even programs you're eligible for can fail at submission because of missing evidence — and that's the second check we run.

For every program you pass eligibility on, Grant Fund maps what's missing for a clean application. We group it into five buckets — each gap shown with what it would take to close, time-estimated, with templates linked where they exist.

Bucket 01
Documents
  • Financials
  • Audited accounts
  • IP filings
  • Certifications
  • Business registry extracts
Bucket 02
Evidence
  • Customer letters of intent
  • Peer-reviewed publications
  • Prior funding records
  • Tech validation results
Bucket 03
Compliance
  • GDPR documentation
  • Ethics approvals
  • Gender equality plan
  • Sustainability assessments
Bucket 04
Partner letters
  • For consortium-based programs:
  • Signed Memoranda of Understanding from each partner
Bucket 05
Narrative anchors
  • Trial endpoints
  • Regulatory pathway
  • Market validation
  • Public-value statement

You either close the gap and apply, or you skip the program for this cycle. Both are valid outcomes.

Layer 2

Where this fails. The honest part.

Grant Fund's check is only as good as the official call text it reads. We cannot:

Predict whether your application will win

That depends on proposal quality, evaluator panel, and competitive landscape we can’t see.

Catch unwritten preferences

Some calls informally favor certain regions, certain language, certain sector framings. We can’t read minds.

Tell you about programs that aren’t published yet

But we re-scan every 7 days and you get a Monday email when something opens.

Replace your judgment on evidence quality

If you have an LOI but it’s from a friend’s startup with no real traction, we’ll log it as "present" — but a real evaluator will not.

What we do is reduce the cost of deciding whether applying makes sense at all — from 4–8 hours of reading per program to 4 minutes for your full eligibility report. The decision is still yours.

Three sample reports below ↓
Horizon
EIC
erc
EIT
Eurostars
Innovation Fund
Sample 01 · Readiness report

What you see when something fits.

Here's what Grant Fund returns when an early-stage hardware startup in France — let's call it Lumen Sense, working on industrial sensors, pre-seed, 8 people — runs its first check this week. The same logic runs for your company when you build your Passport.

readiness_report.lumen-sense.pdf
GENERATED · WED, APR 29, 2026
Grant Fund readiness report
Lumen Sense (example)
France · pre-seed · 8 employees · industrial sensors · TRL 4
Programs scanned
2,813
active EU + national + regional
Last refresh
7 days ago
re-scanned every Monday
Verdict so far
5 fit · 7 not yet · 207 filtered
full breakdown below
FIT
5
programs you can apply to right now
01
EIC Accelerator
Cut-off: October 14, 2026 · up to €2.5M grant + €15M equity
Passes all 7 conditions
Missing for clean submission
  • 2 customer letters of intent (you have 0; the call expects 2–3)
  • 12-month financial projection (template provided)
Suggested next step
Secure 2 LOIs from industrial partners before Sep 15.
02
France 2030 — DeepTech Grand Défi
Ready · 0 gaps
Rolling deadline · up to €5M
Passes all 7 conditions
Missing for clean submission
  • Nothing. You can apply this week.
Suggested next step
Block 90 minutes to draft the technical summary.
03
EIC Pathfinder Open
Cut-off: March 5, 2027 · up to €3M
Passes all 7 conditions (early-TRL hardware match)
Missing for clean submission
  • Peer-reviewed scientific publications by lead researcher
Suggested next step
This is a Q1 2027 application. Plan publication strategy in the next two quarters.
+ 2 more eligible programs in your dashboard
NOT YET
7
programs that need 1–3 missing pieces

You're one condition away from 7 more programs.

View full list →
Most common gapexisting customer revenue > €500K (you're pre-revenue)
NOT FIT
207
programs filtered out

Top reasons your company doesn't fit them:

89
wrong country
(Spain-, Germany-, Italy-only)
47
wrong sector
(pharma, climate, agritech)
35
wrong stage
(Series A+ revenue thresholds)
26
wrong entity type
(university lead required)
10
closed cohorts
(regional restrictions)

You will not see these in your dashboard. They're filtered out so your time isn't wasted reading them.

The example above is for Lumen Sense — a French hardware company you've never heard of, because we made it up. To see this report for your actual company — your country, your stage, your sector — build your Passport. Free, 4–7 minutes, no credit card. Your real fit count will probably look different from Lumen Sense's, and that's exactly the point.

Sample 02 · Negative match memo

What you see when something doesn't fit — and what knowing it saves you.

This is the part most grant tools won't show you. Below is a "no, not for this cut-off" memo on a program many early-stage founders consider — and the math on what knowing this in 4 minutes saves compared to discovering it 6 weeks in.

negative_match.eurostars-3.cutoff-22.pdf
GENERATED · WED, APR 29, 2026
Grant Fund · Negative match memo
Eurostars-3 · Cut-off 22
Looked promising for: Lumen Sense · France · pre-seed · hardware
Verdict
Don't apply for this cut-off.
Not now.
What this program funds

International collaborative R&D projects between SMEs and partners in 2 or more Eurostars countries. Up to €500K per partner.

Why it looked like a fit
  • Hardware R&D match (industrial sensors fit the scope)
  • Technology readiness window TRL 4–6 includes your stage
  • France is an Eurostars-eligible country
  • Your company size is within SME range
Why it isn't — the disqualifier
  • Requires confirmed partners from 2 or more Eurostars countries before submission, with signed Memoranda of Understanding.
  • You currently have 0 confirmed international partners with MoUs.
  • Lead time to find, qualify, and sign 2 international partners typically runs 8 to 14 weeks.
  • Cut-off 22 closes in 6 weeks.
The math doesn't work. Even if you started today, you'd be delivering an admissible application 4–8 weeks after the deadline.
What applying anyway would cost you

If you tried to make this work for Cut-off 22:

CEO and CTO time60–120 hoursover 4–6 weeks
Ops20–40 hourson partner outreach and admin
External advisor time10–20 hours
Total90–180 hours€9,000 to €18,000 of work that wouldn't produce a submitted application.

Plus: 6 weeks of distraction from product, delayed customer pilots, and eroded team focus.

What to do instead
3 options
Option 01
Recommended
Different program, same goal

You have 5 single-applicant programs in your fit list that don’t require consortium structure. Three offer higher per-applicant funding than Eurostars (EIC Accelerator, France 2030, EIC Pathfinder Open).

Option 02
Same program, later cut-off

The next Eurostars cut-off opens March 2027. If international partnerships fit your roadmap anyway, start partner search in Q3 2026. Cut-off 23 becomes a real option then.

Option 03
Build the partner network now

We can flag potential partners from past Eurostars-funded projects in your sector. View partner intelligence in your dashboard.

This is what we mean by "honest answer". Sometimes the best result is "not this one, not now, here's why, and here's what you can do instead". Most grant tools won't tell you this, because they're trying to keep you on the platform. We tell you because keeping your time is the whole point.

Sample 03 · Weekly radar

What lands in your inbox every Monday morning.

The first scan tells you where you stand today. Grant Fund's job after that is to keep your view current as programs change, deadlines move, and new calls open. Here's what one week of monitoring looks like for Lumen Sense, our example company from above.

Inbox · Mon, May 4, 2026 · 7:14 AM
Your weekly radar — 1 new fit, 1 admissibility change, 2 deadlines this month
From
Grant Fund Radar <radar@grantfund.eu>
To
Marie Doucet <marie@lumensense.fr>
Profile
Lumen Sense · France · pre-seed · industrial sensors · TRL 4 · 12 programs tracked
The 60-second read
1new program opened that fits you
1program you’re tracking changed admissibility
2deadlines coming up in the next 30 days
1readiness gap closed since last week (you signed an LOI)
01
New program you can apply to
ADEME — Démonstrateurs en condition réelle
✓ passes all 7 conditions
First call cut-off: July 22, 2026 · up to €1.5M · French national program
Why you'll like it
Single-applicant — no consortium needed.
Why you might pass
Focused on industrial demonstrators in real conditions — your Q3 pilot maps directly.
Suggested next step30 minutes to review the call text — we've highlighted the 4 sections that matter most for you.
02
Eligibility change on a program you're tracking
EIC Pathfinder Open
⚑ change published Apr 30
− TRL window 1–4
+ TRL window narrowed to 2–4

Your stated TRL 4 still passes (you're at the upper edge).

Action you might wantLock in your TRL evidence — technical milestones, lab-to-prototype documentation — before submitting. We've added a "TRL evidence" tab to your readiness checklist.
03
Deadlines in the next 30 days
Cut-off
May 28
France 2030 DeepTech Grand Défi
rolling, but next review committee meets May 28
Ready to submit
0 gaps remaining
Cut-off
Jun 14
EIC Accelerator
preliminary screening cut-off
1 gap remaining
1 LOI secured Apr 27 · 1 more to go
04
Readiness gaps update
✓ Closed this week
Customer LOI #1

Logged from your April 27 email forward. Verified against EIC Accelerator's LOI requirements.

→ 3 programs moved closer to ready.
→ Still open (3)
  • Customer LOI #2 (for EIC Accelerator)
  • Peer-reviewed publication by lead researcher (for EIC Pathfinder Open)
  • 12-month financial projection (template, ~90 minutes to fill)
What to do this week
01
Block 90 minutes for the France 2030 submission before May 28
It’s the only one where you have zero gaps remaining.
Priority
02
Reach out to 2 industrial partners for the second EIC Accelerator LOI before June 14
03
Read the new ADEME call text (30 minutes)
Decide if it fits your roadmap.
Skip this weekEIC Pathfinder Open paperwork. You can wait for the publication gap to close (Q3 2026 timeline).

One email. Six bullets in the 60-second read at the top. The rest is there if you want detail. Tied to your specific company profile, not a generic newsletter. We send it Monday between 6:30 and 8:30am local time, so it's the first thing on your desk — not the fortieth.

The whole product, in five parts.

Each one connects to something you can verify in the sample reports above.

01

Programs from all three layers of European funding.

Most tools cover one layer — usually the central EU programs (Horizon Europe, EIC, Digital Europe). Or they cover one country in depth. Grant Fund covers all three layers in one place: EU central programs, 27 national innovation agencies (Bpifrance, BMWK, RVO, CDTI, and others), and ~120 regional programs across member states. None of the other tools we know cover all three layers in one self-serve product.

Coverage
2,813
active programs
re-scanned every 7 days
02

Built for the founder writing it, not the consultant managing it.

Most grant tools assume a grant writer or full-time consultant in the loop — someone whose job is grants. Grant Fund assumes a founder with three other priorities and one hour for this. Every program has a one-glance verdict. Every email is six bullets, not three pages. The Passport walks you through TRL definitions you'd otherwise need to look up. The eligibility audit links to the original call text so you can verify our reading in the same window.

Audience
1 hour
assumed budget
not a full-time grants role
03

Formal eligibility, not "relevance scores".

Most tools rank programs by keyword similarity — and that produces 50 "matches" you'll never qualify for. We screen against 7 formal admissibility conditions (country, entity type, TRL window, stage, sector, size, participation format). If your company doesn't pass any one of them, the program doesn't appear in your fit list. Each verdict is traceable to the exact line in the program's official call text — the same text the program will use to evaluate your application.

Method
7
formal conditions
from the official call text
04

What’s missing for a clean submission, not just "you’re eligible".

Eligibility tells you if you can apply. It doesn't tell you if you should apply now. For every eligible program, Grant Fund shows what's missing for a clean submission: customer letters of intent, peer-reviewed publications, financial projections, partner letters, ethics approvals, gender equality plan. Each gap shows what it would take to close — concrete, time-estimated, with templates linked where they exist. Most tools stop at "eligible". The actual founder question — "eligible and ready?" — gets answered here.

Readiness
5 buckets
evidence checked
docs · evidence · compliance · partners · narrative
05

What changed last week, in one Monday email.

Programs open. Eligibility windows narrow. Deadlines move forward two weeks without warning. Most ways of staying current — newsletters, RSS feeds, manual portal-watching — produce noise without prioritization for your specific situation. Grant Fund's Weekly Radar lands Monday morning with six bullets in the 60-second read: new programs that fit your Passport, eligibility changes on programs you're tracking, deadline approaches. The example above (Lumen Sense, May 4) shows what one week looks like.

Monitoring
6 bullets
in the 60-second read
tied to your specific Passport

How it works, in three steps.

First step is free. Decide whether to subscribe after you see the first scan.

01
Step 1 of 3

Build your Passport.

Time
4–7 minutes
Cost
Free · no credit card

Your Passport is your company described in 18 fields: country, legal entity type, founding date, employee count, revenue, balance sheet, sector, TRL, IP status, prior funding, planned consortium structure, and a few more. The system explains each field as you go — what TRL 4 vs 5 means for hardware, what counts as "lead applicant" vs "partner". You can edit any field anytime.

What you get
A machine-readable profile of your company, exportable as JSON.
02
Step 2 of 3
Free first scan

See your fit, blockers, and next steps.

Time
60 seconds
Cost
Free · fully visible · no paywall

Your first scan runs against 2,813 active programs: programs that fit you (with what's missing for a clean submission), programs that need 1–3 things to unlock, and a summary of what was filtered out and why. Each fit links to the official call text. Each readiness gap shows what would close it. Each next step has a time estimate.

What you get
The same readiness report shown above — for your actual company.
03
Step 3 of 3

Stay current with weekly Monday updates.

Time
Every Monday morning
Cost
€149/month · or €99 with annual prepay

Subscribe to keep the view current. Every Monday, you receive a Weekly Radar email — six bullets max in the 60-second read, with new programs that fit your Passport, eligibility changes on programs you're tracking, and deadline approaches. Tied to your specific company, not a generic newsletter. Cancel in two clicks at end of month — no retention loops.

What you get
One Monday email per week. Same format as the radar shown above.

That's the whole flow. Step 1 has no cost or commitment. Step 2 is your free first scan. Step 3 is the recurring product if you want it.

Compared to what you might be doing now.

Four ways to handle European grants. Different time, different cost, different verdicts.

Manual search
EU portal + Google
Consultancy
€1,500–4,000/mo
Online grant tools
Search engines
Grant Fund
€149/mo · self-serve
Time it eats per month
Manual search
24–51 hours
Consultancy
0–4 hours
(you wait)
Online grant tools
4–10 hours
(false positives)
Grant Fund
1–3 hours
Where it looks
Manual search
Wherever you go manually
Consultancy
Depends on the consultant
Online grant tools
Mostly central EU programs
Grant Fund
EU + 27 national + ~120 regional
How it decides what fits
Manual search
You read every call yourself
Consultancy
Consultant’s reading and judgment
Online grant tools
Keyword "relevance scores"
Grant Fund
Formal 7-criteria check
What’s missing for submission
Manual search
You figure it out, per program
Consultancy
Verbal, in calls
Online grant tools
Not addressed
Grant Fund
Built into every fit report
Self-serve start
Manual search
yes
free
Consultancy
no
sales call required
Online grant tools
yes
Grant Fund
yes
Monthly cost
Manual search
Time only
Consultancy
€1,500–4,000
+ per-application fees
Online grant tools
€30–150
Grant Fund
€149
€99 with annual prepay
Verdict you can verify
Manual search
Yes — you did it yourself
Consultancy
Trust the consultant
Online grant tools
"Relevance score" — based on what?
Grant Fund
Yes — every check links to call text
None of these are wrong. They just have different costs and different blind spots.
Read the full methodology breakdown ↑

How much, what you get, how to leave.

Three things you should know before signing up. All three are on this page.

Monthly
€149
/ month
billed every month
cancel at end of month
no annual commitment
Annual
€99
/ month
Start your grant trackGet your free grant fit check4–7 min · No credit card · No sales call

What this replaces, and what it doesn’t.

It replaces

24–51 hours / month of manual grant search. At founder-time rates of €100/hour, that’s €2,400–€5,100 of your time, every month, redirected from the product to portal-reading.

Hiring an EU grants consultant on retainer. €1,500–€4,000/month for ongoing eligibility, monitoring, and document tracking — plus €5,000–€15,000 per submitted application.

It reduces

The risk of one wrong-route attempt costing your team 120–260 hours (€12,000–€26,000) over six to twelve weeks before someone notices the call wasn’t admissible in the first place.

It doesn’t replace

Writing the actual proposal. You do that, or you hire a specialist when you’ve decided which programs are worth writing for.

Making the strategic call on whether to apply at all. We give you the eligibility verdict, the readiness gaps, and the deadline math. The decision stays yours.

On the bill

What you get for €149 (or €99) per month.

  • 01
    Unlimited eligibility scans against 2,813 active programs
  • 02
    3-layer coverage: EU central + 27 national agencies + ~120 regional programs
  • 03
    Weekly Monday Radar tied to your specific Passport
  • 04
    Readiness tracking on every eligible program — five evidence buckets, gap-by-gap
  • 05
    Full 7-criteria audit per program, traceable to the official call text
  • 06
    Negative Match Memos for programs that don’t fit, with cost-of-applying math
  • 07
    VAT receipt on every payment, formatted for non-dilutive funding accounting
  • 08
    Email support, ≤24 hours response, founder-led
  • 09
    EU-hosted (Frankfurt), GDPR-compliant, full export in JSON or PDF anytime
Not on the bill

What you won’t see.

  • No setup fee
  • No onboarding fee
  • No per-seat pricing
  • No "first month free, then we lock you in for a year"
  • No "starting from" prices that hide tiers
  • No demo call required to subscribe
  • No annual lock-in on the monthly plan

How to leave (and how the refund works).

01

Cancellation

Two clicks, end of month.

Cancel any time from your dashboard. Cancellation takes effect at the end of the current month — your access continues until then. No retention loops, no “are you sure?” pop-ups, no offers to lower the price if you stay.

02

Refund of the last month

20 minutes with our founder.

If you want your last month’s payment back, book a 20-minute call with our founder. We promise this is not a retention pitch — we won’t try to convince you to stay, lower the price, or extend the trial. We just want to understand what didn’t work, because we learn faster from churn calls than from churn dashboards. Refund processed within three business days of the call.

Both paths exist on purpose

If you’d rather not have the call, that’s also fine. Cancel without the conversation — you keep your access until end of month, the cancellation goes through, and your last month’s payment stays with us. We picked this structure because most refund policies are either “no refund, ever” or “automatic refund, no questions asked” — and neither one gives a small team a chance to learn. We chose the middle path.

EU-hosted· FrankfurtGDPR-compliantISO 27001· in processSOC 2· planned 2027VAT-EU registeredReceipts· PDF, non-dilutive accounting

The honest answer: at €149/month, Grant Fund pays for itself if it saves you four hours a month, or if it stops one wrong-route application before it starts. If you’ve never spent founder time on EU grants — you’ll never need it. If you have, you already know the math.

4–7 minutes · No credit card · No sales call

Built by Aleks Novak, who applied to 14 EU grants before this — and lost 9 of them on conditions that could've been checked in 4 minutes.

Hi — I'm Aleks Novak.

Before Grant Fund, I was the Head of R&D at Helix Robotics — a deeptech company building autonomous warehouse picking arms for mid-size logistics operators. Over four years, we won 5 EU grants and lost 9 that we shouldn't have applied to in the first place. Each lost attempt cost us 6–11 team weeks. Most of those weeks were spent on programs that — when I went back and read the original call texts — we were never going to pass.

The pattern was always the same. We'd see a call that looked relevant. We'd spend two evenings reading it. We'd start drafting. Three weeks later, somewhere in section 4 of an annex, we'd find a single condition we didn't meet — and the whole stretch was inadmissible. By then we'd lost an entire product milestone — our pilot integration with a Tier-1 retailer slipped from Q2 to Q4.

I built Grant Fund because I didn't want another founder to spend a quarter on a grant they could've ruled out in 4 minutes.

The 7 conditions we screen are not exotic. They're in every published call. The hard part is the discipline to check all 7 before doing any other work. We built that discipline into software so you don't have to.

Aleks Novak
Aleks Novak
Founder & CEO, Grant Fund
founder@grantfund.eu
One last thing

We publish our pricing on the landing because we'd rather lose a curious visitor than waste their hour on a sales call that could've been a price card. We refund through a 20-minute interview because we learn faster from churn calls than from churn dashboards. We don't promise we'll win you a grant because nobody can.

If any of this is the kind of company you'd want to work with — build your Passport below.

4–7 minutes · No credit card · No sales call

First deeptech founders who tested Grant Fund through Q1 2026.

We're collecting our first round of testimonials from pilot users through Q1 2026. They'll appear here when they're real and signed off by the founders.

Until then — this space stays honest about being empty.

Collecting · Q1 2026Publishing · founder-signed onlyBackdating · never
DEEPTECHHARDWARECLIMATEBIOTECHSEMIROBOTICSQUANTUMPHOTONICS
Pilot user · Q4 2025
“Grant Fund ruled out 6 of the 9 EU programs we had on our list — in 4 minutes — because of trivial things we'd missed. Saved us a quarter we were about to throw at Eurostars.”
Chinedu Okafor
Chinedu Okafor
CEO, Verditech
Hardware · seed🇫🇷 France
Pilot user · Q1 2026
“The negative-match memo is the most useful thing I've read about EU funding. It's the artifact I always wished consultants would produce — and never did.”
Johanna Haas
Johanna Haas
Co-founder, Boreal Materials
Climate · Series A🇩🇪 Germany
Awaiting sign-off
Biotech · seed🇳🇱 Netherlands

We'd rather show empty cards than fabricate quotes. The three above are real pilot users, with text signed off by each founder before publication. If you're a deeptech founder using Grant Fund right now and you'd be open to a 20-minute conversation about what's working and what isn't — write to founder@grantfund.eu.

Status · 3 / 3 collected

Questions deeptech founders ask before signing up.

If your question isn't here, email founder@grantfund.eu — typical response time under 24 hours, from the founder, not a support tier.

Marie Doucet
Pilot user · Q4 2025
"Grant Fund showed me in 4 minutes that 11 of the 14 EIC-related programs I had on my radar were ineligible due to TRL or consortium structure. I cancelled three planned applications and redirected the time to finalising our patent filing. The 4 minutes saved us approximately 6 weeks."
Marie DoucetCEO, Lumen Sense
Q1

What if no grant fits us right now?

It happens, especially for very early-stage companies (pre-TRL 3) or companies in geographies with thinner program coverage. We tell you exactly which conditions you don't pass and what would change to unlock programs — for example: "reach TRL 5 from current TRL 3", or "add 1 customer LOI to qualify for EIC Accelerator". For some founders, the most useful outcome of Grant Fund is finding out that grants aren't the right path right now — that saves 6 to 12 weeks of misdirected effort on the wrong route.

If your first scan returns zero or only "not yet" programs, you can cancel before paying anything. The Passport itself is free. We've seen a few cases where founders thanked us for the "no, not yet" verdict — they would have spent the next quarter pursuing a program that wasn't admissible, and our 4-minute check let them redirect that quarter to product.

Q2

Why should I trust your eligibility check over a consultant's?

Every "yes/no" in your fit report links to the exact text of the program's official call. You can verify each check yourself in the EU portal — and we recommend you do for the first three programs. A consultant gives you opinions that depend on their reading of the call. We give you a deterministic check against published criteria. Both have value.

The difference: consultants cost €1,500–€4,000/month and start with a sales call. We cost €149 and start with a 4-minute Passport. If you eventually decide you need a consultant for proposal writing, that's a separate decision — we can refer you to specialists we trust.

Q3

What happens immediately after I build my Passport?

Within 60 seconds of submitting your Passport, you see your first scan: a fit report with eligible programs, "not yet" programs (with what would unlock them), and a summary of why ineligible programs were filtered out. The fit report is fully visible and exportable. There's no paywall on the first scan.

You decide afterward whether to subscribe for ongoing access — weekly Monday Radar, readiness tracking on each program, full Negative Match Memos. If you don't subscribe, you keep your Passport export and the first scan. We don't email you to upgrade.

Q4

Do you cover programs in my country or region?

Yes for all 27 EU member states (national agencies + ~120 regional programs). We currently don't cover UK Innovate, Switzerland Innosuisse, Israel Innovation Authority, or non-EU jurisdictions — those are on the public roadmap for Q3 2026.

If your country is missing or thinly covered, write to founder@grantfund.eu. We prioritize coverage based on demand from real users, not country size.

Q5

Will my company data be used to train AI?

No. Your Passport is private. We don't use it to train models, share it with third parties, or sell it. It's EU-hosted (Frankfurt). You can export everything we hold on you as JSON or PDF anytime from your account page, and deleting your account takes effect immediately — access is revoked at once and all personal data is permanently erased within 90 days. Technical IP and location logs are anonymised on a rolling schedule, not kept indefinitely.

If you have specific data residency or compliance requirements — for an investor or due-diligence process — email us, and we'll send our DPA and security overview.

Q6

Do you write proposals or help with applications?

No. Grant Fund stops at "you're eligible, here's what's missing for a clean submission". For proposal writing, you have three options:

  • (a) draft yourself using public templates from the EC and national agencies (we link to these)
  • (b) hire a specialist for proposal-only support (typical: €5,000–€15,000 per submitted application)
  • (c) work with a consultancy retainer for ongoing strategy plus writing (€1,500–€4,000/month)

We can refer you to vetted EU grant writers we've seen produce strong work. We don't take referral fees.

Q7

Why €149 when other AI grant tools are cheaper?

Group4Grant and GrantsFinder start at €29–65/month — search engines that rank programs by keyword relevance. Subsidies.io starts at $99/scan or $500/year for Netherlands-focused coverage. Grantable starts at $50/month for US foundation grants. Each does one piece well. None do all three of: 7-criteria formal eligibility check + readiness tracking + 3-layer EU coverage (EU central + 27 national + ~120 regional) in one self-serve product.

Closest comparable in scope is Cogrant — hybrid consultancy with algorithmic screening — but they don't publish prices and start with a sales call. €149 is what it costs to keep Grant Fund self-serve, sales-call-free, and run by a team small enough to know every customer. If you're already paying for a consultant or losing 4+ hours a week to manual search, €149 is the smaller bill, not the bigger one.

Q8

What if I don't want the 20-minute interview to get my refund?

Then you cancel without it. Cancellation goes through normally: your access continues until end of month, no retention loops, no calls, no emails. Your last month's payment stays with us. The 20-minute call is the path to a refund — it's not a path to keeping your subscription. If the conversation isn't interesting to you, the cancellation works the same way without it.

Both options exist on purpose. We picked this structure because we'd rather lose €149 to learn what didn't work than refund automatically and stay confused about why people leave.

Q9

What if I'm not sure which TRL my project is at?

The Passport walks you through the standard EU TRL definitions (TRL 1–9), with a one-line description and one example for each level. If you're between two levels, set TRL to the lower one — most programs anchor eligibility on the lower bound, so the conservative setting expands your options rather than narrowing them.

You can edit your TRL anytime; rescans are unlimited and free for subscribers. If you're truly unsure (TRL 4 vs 5 is a common confusion for hardware founders), we have a free TRL self-assessment guide built into the Passport flow — no signup beyond the Passport itself.

Q10

What's on the roadmap?

Q3 2026
UK Innovate (subject to UK association status), Switzerland Innosuisse, Israel Innovation Authority.
Q4 2026
Consortium partner search for first-time consortium leads.
Q1 2027
Grant Fund for TRL 6–9 single-applicant to consortium-lead transitions.

Full public roadmap with current development progress and a feedback form is at grantfund.eu/roadmap. We don't promise dates we can't hit. If something is on the roadmap, it's because we're building it — not because it's a marketing line.

If you've read this far

You probably have a specific situation in mind — a deadline you're considering, a call you've been reading, a consultant proposal you're weighing.

Whatever path you're on right now is the status quo. The 4-minute Passport tells you whether that path is worth continuing. That's the only reason we built it.

4–7 minutes · No credit card · No sales call
Question not answered here? founder@grantfund.eu — typical response time under 24 hours, from the founder, not a support tier.

Build your Passport. See your fit, blockers, and next steps in under 5 minutes.

Free to start. €149/month if you keep it past the first scan. €99/month with annual prepay. Cancel in two clicks at end of month.
If grants aren't worth your time right now — you'll know that too, in the same 4 minutes.

Monthly
€149/mo
Annual · save €600
€99/mo
4–7 minutes·No credit card·No sales call·Result on your screen, not in your email
One more thing

We built this so the answer comes in minutes, not weeks. The rest of your runway should be on the product.

Cookie preferences

We use strictly necessary cookies to run the site, and — only with your consent — analytics and marketing cookies. You can change your choice anytime.